The split attraction model (SAM) emerges as a comprehensive framework for understanding the intricate tapestry of human attraction, encompassing both sexual and romantic orientations. This model recognizes that these two aspects of attraction can exist independently, leading to a nuanced understanding of individual experiences and orientations.
According to SAM, romantic orientation pertains to the emotional and affectionate attractions an individual experiences towards others, while sexual orientation refers to the physical and sexual attractions experienced by an individual. This distinction allows for a deeper exploration of the complexities of attraction, acknowledging that the two can be intertwined or distinct.
The concept of SAM has been woven into the tapestry of human understanding for centuries, with its origins tracing back to the 19th century. German gay activist Karl Heinrich Ulrichs put forward the idea of various types of attractions among non-heterosexual individuals, categorizing them as "tender" and "passionate." Psychologist Dorothy Tennov introduced the term "limerence" to describe a type of attraction that encompasses both sexual and emotional elements.
The split attraction model holds particular significance for individuals identifying as asexual or aromantic. For asexual individuals, their sexual orientation refers to who they are physically attracted to, while their romantic orientation pertains to the emotional and affectionate connections they desire. Aromantic individuals, on the other hand, may experience sexual attraction but lack romantic attraction.
The split attraction model has not been without its criticisms. Some argue that it overemphasizes sexual desire and attraction, potentially leading to confusion for young people exploring their sexual and romantic identities. Others express concern about the model's all-encompassing nature, suggesting that it might not accurately portray the experiences of all individuals.
The split attraction model stands as a valuable framework for comprehending the intricate interplay between sexual and romantic orientations. While it holds particular relevance for asexual and aromantic individuals, its applicability to all has been a subject of discussion. Ultimately, the terminology and models that resonate with an individual should be the ones used to describe their own experiences and orientations.