Introduction:
In February 2024, I had the opportunity to engage in a month-long trial of Thriveworks, an innovative online therapy platform that recently launched its services in South Dakota. As a psychologist specializing in Neurodiversity-affirming therapy, I was eager to explore the platform and assess its suitability for clients seeking support in this area.
Pros:
Comprehensive Services: Thriveworks provides a diverse range of services, including individual, couples, family, and child/adolescent therapy. Additionally, they offer medication management, ensuring a holistic approach to mental health care.
Educational Resources: The platform features a commendable collection of free educational resources, including downloadable ebooks and informative blog posts covering various mental health topics. This information empowers clients with valuable knowledge and guidance.
Hybrid Service Model: Thriveworks offers both in-person and online therapy sessions, providing flexibility for clients who prefer face-to-face interactions.
Cons:
Cost Factor: The platform's service fees can be substantial for individuals paying out-of-pocket. The initial intake session is priced at $200, while subsequent hour-long sessions are charged at $170 each.
Insurance Coverage: Thriveworks's services do not enjoy universal insurance coverage. Depending on the insurance policy and provider, clients may have to cover the costs entirely from their own pockets.
Online Scheduling Limitations: My experience with online appointment scheduling was less than ideal, requiring phone calls to customer service instead. This adds an unnecessary layer of inconvenience.
Mismatch in Therapy Specialization: Despite my explicit request for a Neurodiversity-affirming therapist, I was only connected to a counselor specializing in general mental health concerns. This mismatch may be attributed to the platform's therapist availability.
Ethical Concerns: I had reservations regarding Thriveworks's practice of soliciting reviews from active clients, as it might potentially compromise the authenticity and objectivity of client feedback.
Therapy Experience:
Initial Session: During the initial intake session, my therapist displayed a structured interview style, actively gathering information about my background, treatment goals, and preferred therapeutic approach. While their initial approach seemed Neurodiversity-affirming, I observed that the therapist lacked specific training in this area.
Follow-Up Sessions: Subsequent sessions proved beneficial, with the therapist actively following up on previous discussions and providing ample space for new developments to be addressed. The approach shifted to become less structured,